Hey guys I looked on ebay and these two clutches seem to be OEM replacements, Sachs and LuK. Which one is better/holds up better/longer life/etc? Any help appreciated! Sid
#2563, "RE: Which clutch is better? LUK or SACHS?" In response to Reply # 0 Apr-01-04 03:35 PM by XtremeRS
Originally posted by Desibabu345 Hey guys I looked on ebay and these two clutches seem to be OEM replacements, Sachs and LuK. Which one is better/holds up better/longer life/etc? Any help appreciated! Sid
Well from my own personal findings, and using both the Luk, and the Sachs pressure plates, the Sachs may have a better pressure plate/more plate load over the LUK. I can't verify this with plate load numbers, at least not yet anyway, but i used a Sashs plate with a 6 puck ceramic disk, and a Luk plate with a 4 puck disk, and the LUK slips at 13psi, and the Sachs never did..just food for thought..I am actually going to have both pressure plates, and also a Clutchmasters plate put on a plate load tester to find some real world numbers,here in the near future..more out of curiosity..Oh yeah, I'm moving this to the trans section where it belongs
13.5 @108 MPH-2.2 60ft(stupid FWD!) S16G @ 18 PSI/FMIC/Running on MegaSquirt II (Now with sequential fuel injection) My webpage: http://eclipsed4evr.home.comcast.net -1998 Mitsubishi Eclipse RS-T- "Toy" -1992 Plymouth Laser Turbo AWD(SOLD) -2000 Honda CR-V(daily)
Search
Printer-friendly copy
0 Users in Chat
