nothing like driving with the windows down and the music low: i love hearing the turbo spool, swwwhhhttt!!!! thanks for www.kaptainmyke.com for the sig hosting
#2731, "RE: running without a tcu?" In response to Reply # 1
I'd be worried about other problems cropping up when you control the solenoids yourself and disconnect the TCU. You could imagine that the stock TCU allows more slip when the fluid is cold, goes into limp mode if a problem is detected, shifts at redline if you forget, pulses the solenoids so they don't burn out, and other random things. The TCU and ECU also talk over a couple different lines. They discuss things like timing retard while shifting and who knows what else. Now, could you remove the TCU, install the controller, remove the AT ECU, and install a MT ECU? Would that let you redline at 7500 (or whatever it is for MT)? There are alot of questions that need answering. Most of it boils down to someone just buying it and testing.
Corbin
'95 ESI-T HRC+FMIC+ETC...
Gimme fuel...Gimme fire...Gimme that which I desire
#2738, "RE: running without a tcu?" In response to Reply # 4
yes, probably, no one really knows but the guy who made it. If he wants to sell more he should come on here and talk it up. give us the info.
But yes the TCU takes in to account alot of variables before it decides to shift anything. like clutch volume indexes,etc.. I thought it said it was only for emergencies or when the car is in limp mode from a stupid sensor. thats the only time I would use it without the TCU.
I still think that the autostick mod is cheaper and easier and the TCU is controlling shifts correctly.