Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Handling/Suspension topic #33188
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: v6 avenger suspension on 98 eclipse. good or bad idea" Previous topic | Next topic
98_eclipseFeb-03-11 06:46 PM
Member since Aug 25th 2010
22 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#33191, "RE: v6 avenger suspension on 98 eclipse. good or bad idea"
In response to In response to 1


          

Originally posted by DarkOne
The front springs on the Avenger are not interchangeable with the 2GNT. The rear will fit, but are a heavier spring rate and are slightly taller.


When you say the springs aren't compatible do you mean the springs or the whole clover?I am wanting to unbolt my springs and struts all in one piece and replace them with the avenger suspension. Like a bolt on kinda thing. Will this still not work.

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

v6 avenger suspension on 98 eclipse. good or bad idea [View all] , 98_eclipse, Feb-03-11 11:05 AM
  RE: v6 avenger suspension on 98 eclipse. good or bad idea, Global Ruler Of All ThingsDarkOne, Feb-03-11 11:39 AM, #1
RE: v6 avenger suspension on 98 eclipse. good or bad idea, 98_eclipse, Feb-03-11 11:58 AM, #2
RE: v6 avenger suspension on 98 eclipse. good or bad idea, 98_eclipse, Feb-03-11 06:46 PM #3
      RE: v6 avenger suspension on 98 eclipse. good or bad idea, freelancefool, Feb-11-11 06:55 PM, #4
           RE: v6 avenger suspension on 98 eclipse. good or bad idea, 98_eclipse, Feb-12-11 06:56 AM, #5

Top 2GNT Technical Handling/Suspension topic #33188 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.032909154891968 seconds, executing 12 queries.