Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Handling/Suspension topic #32034
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good?" Previous topic | Next topic
eclipse982nrRSTFeb-27-09 09:30 PM
Member since Mar 16th 2004
6314 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#32039, "RE: New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good?"
In response to In response to 4


          

Lol, They charged you for a full front end alignment.

I work at a Chevy dealership as a tech and we charge $40 for a toe set. They should have also informed you about the front camber being out and should have asked if you would have liked to purchase an addition part to get that into spec.

-MIKE-

Stroked 2.2L

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good? [View all] , TheRedBarren, Feb-27-09 06:07 PM
  RE: New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good?, RoninEclipse2G, Feb-27-09 07:12 PM, #1
RE: New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good?, TheRedBarren, Feb-27-09 07:13 PM, #2
      RE: New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good?, RoninEclipse2G, Feb-27-09 07:22 PM, #3
           RE: New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good?, TheRedBarren, Feb-27-09 07:50 PM, #4
                RE: New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good?, eclipse982nrRST, Feb-27-09 09:30 PM #5
                     RE: New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good?, Slimyjr., Mar-18-09 04:10 PM, #6
                          RE: New Alignment Job, are these SPECS good?, RoninEclipse2G, Mar-18-09 04:13 PM, #7

Top 2GNT Technical Handling/Suspension topic #32034 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.029172897338867 seconds, executing 12 queries.