Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Handling/Suspension topic #20212
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: 3G Eclipse rims" Previous topic | Next topic
97_420aSep-28-03 06:36 PM
Member since Jul 17th 2002
119 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#20236, "RE: 3G Eclipse rims"
In response to In response to 6


          

i read somewhere that the 3g rims are heavier than gsx rims. mainly b/c mitsu used a 1 piece design over the 2 piece, and they used a stronger(also heavier) alloy on the 3g's. but that they are stronger(ie: more resistant to bending)if you look, alot of times, the gsx 17s are almost always bent in some way shape or form, same as the avenger/sebring coupe 17s. i think there was a lawsuit about the quality of the 17s and maybe the 16s on the 2g's

Dan
97 Base Dodge Avenger
aem cai, jeep tb, 17" gsx rims, tq mod, eclipse center console, shift knob, autometer phantom trans temp & a/f gauge

boosted by summer

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

3G Eclipse rims [View all] , Pharcyde, Sep-27-03 10:58 AM
  RE: 3G Eclipse rims, zhr420, Sep-27-03 11:05 AM, #1
RE: 3G Eclipse rims, zhr420, Sep-27-03 11:05 AM, #2
RE: 3G Eclipse rims, eclipse_gs_1512, Sep-27-03 12:06 PM, #3
RE: 3G Eclipse rims, Pharcyde, Sep-27-03 03:27 PM, #4
RE: 3G Eclipse rims, BlueMach5, Sep-27-03 04:33 PM, #5
      RE: 3G Eclipse rims, Amish_Eclipse, Sep-28-03 10:13 AM, #6
           RE: 3G Eclipse rims, 97_420a, Sep-28-03 06:36 PM #7
                RE: 3G Eclipse rims, Amish_Eclipse, Sep-29-03 10:09 AM, #8

Top 2GNT Technical Handling/Suspension topic #20212 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.026076078414917 seconds, executing 12 queries.