Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Engine Management Systems & Controllers topic #5452
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: Megasquirt load vs map sensor" Previous topic | Next topic
AdministratorCODE4Jan-01-12 12:21 PM
Member since Nov 23rd 2003
2552 posts, 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#5453, "RE: Megasquirt load vs map sensor"
In response to In response to 0



          

I have never used the 3 bar sensor - only the stock 2.5 and 4 bar (with baro, which I am currently using).

I will have to queue up a load gauge, as I only use a MAP gauge, along with two digital readouts for vac & boost in TunerStudios.

For shits & giggles, have you tried loading up TunerStudios and seeing if the same discrepancy exists?

---

2012 2500HD LML

  
Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

Megasquirt load vs map sensor [View all] , SilvrEclips, Jan-01-12 12:10 PM
  RE: Megasquirt load vs map sensor, AdministratorCODE4, Jan-01-12 12:21 PM #1
RE: Megasquirt load vs map sensor, SilvrEclips, Jan-01-12 12:33 PM, #2
      RE: Megasquirt load vs map sensor, AdministratorCODE4, Jan-01-12 07:53 PM, #3
           RE: Megasquirt load vs map sensor, SilvrEclips, Jan-01-12 09:17 PM, #4
                RE: Megasquirt load vs map sensor, 740 turbo brick, Jan-02-12 11:22 PM, #5
                     RE: Megasquirt load vs map sensor, SilvrEclips, Jan-10-12 09:06 PM, #6

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Engine Management Systems & Controllers topic #5452 Previous topic | Next topic
   

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.013396978378296 seconds, executing 14 queries.