Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Real Racing topic #438
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?" Previous topic | Next topic
wakebord99May-08-02 01:14 PM
Old School 2GNTer
130 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#455, "RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?"
In response to In response to 16


          

HA Mustang GTs are a joke. The new ones are even slower than the 5.0s. I was pissing on them before i rebuilt my engine. Just stage II.

O- and as far as the govenor goes.. Yep i can red-line in 5th.. the rev limiter does suck though.. 170s just isn't fast enough.. did u know a vette can go faster than 170.. Damnit !!!




97' Eclipse RS (kinda)

Present mods:
HRC stage III turbo kit (12 psi street, 25 psi track) / HKS 2 1/2" cat back exhaust w/burnt cat / 16" wheels w/Yokohomo tires (215/40) / 420A engine w/ tooled crank, billet crower rods, and 8.5:1 JE pistons / Head ported and polished, 3 angled valve job
Power-stop brakes w/axis pads / Ebachi Pro lowering kit (1.8") / MSD DIS-2 ignition system w/turbo retard

Near Future:
Stand-alone fuel system / 550cc injectors, and fuel rail / TEC III fuel/ecu system / 17” Hart racing wheels / KYB AGX struts, w/ upgraded anti sway bars / Rear brake conversion (front to rear, Brembo in front)

Jay-
wakbrd99@aol.com



97' Eclipse RS (kinda)

Present mods:
HRC stage III turbo kit (12 psi street, 25 psi track) / HKS 2 1/2" cat back exhaust w/burnt cat / 16" wheels w/Yokohomo tires (215/40) / 420A engine w/ tool

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang? [View all] , xEclipsE RaceRx, Jan-29-02 09:57 AM
  RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, RSin oRACLe, Jan-29-02 11:05 AM, #1
RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, Thunderous_Talon, Jan-29-02 02:00 PM, #2
      RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, Fast420A, Jan-29-02 07:24 PM, #3
RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, ModeratorVX100, Jan-30-02 02:46 AM, #4
RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, xEclipsE RaceRx, Jan-30-02 08:36 AM, #5
      RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, Thunderous_Talon, Jan-30-02 08:43 AM, #6
           RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, Fast420A, Jan-30-02 10:21 AM, #7
                RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, EsiTalon96, Jan-30-02 03:13 PM, #8
                     RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, SaberKhan, Jan-30-02 04:04 PM, #9
                     RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, SaberKhan, Jan-30-02 04:09 PM, #10
                          RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, HadesOmega, Feb-02-02 05:21 PM, #11
                               RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, Moderatorxcasbonx, Feb-04-02 02:06 AM, #12
                               RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, fatchance, May-07-02 08:26 PM, #14
                               RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, fasterGS, May-08-02 05:00 AM, #15
                               RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, DSBLK93GT, Feb-19-02 05:55 PM, #13
                                    RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, TeamMichael_97RS, May-08-02 08:27 AM, #16
                                         RE: Was I suppose to beat a 150 HP Mustang?, wakebord99, May-08-02 01:14 PM #17

Top 2GNT Technical Performance/Engine Real Racing topic #438 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.01775598526001 seconds, executing 14 queries.