Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 0 Users in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Interior/Exterior Audio, Alarms, AV topic #8115
View in threaded mode

Subject: "RE: how bad are sony HU's?" Previous topic | Next topic
Blk95TalonFeb-12-04 11:21 AM
Member since Feb 20th 2002
875 posts,
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#8138, "RE: how bad are sony HU's?"
In response to In response to 8
Feb-12-04 11:23 AM by Blk95Talon

          

I've got a sony CDX-CA660X head unit, its got a lot of cool and useful features compared to a prior pioneer I had in my talon...but the sony one skips often, sometimes even from a door shutting. But I wouldnt consider spending the money to replace it, everything else on it works great.

Account disabled upon user's request.

-CODE4

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

how bad are sony HU's? [View all] , MCubed45, Feb-07-04 07:27 AM
  RE: how bad are sony HU's?, a_miller_76, Feb-07-04 08:47 AM, #1
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, My9t5Talon, Feb-07-04 02:59 PM, #2
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, 95dsmrsproj, Feb-07-04 04:43 PM, #3
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, 96Eclipsed, Feb-07-04 08:42 PM, #4
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, MCubed45, Feb-07-04 11:08 PM, #5
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, willmayo, Feb-08-04 06:54 AM, #6
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, coppereclipse95, Feb-09-04 06:37 AM, #7
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, 1996talon, Feb-09-04 06:54 AM, #8
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, Blk95Talon, Feb-12-04 11:21 AM #9
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, ToTaLEkLyPz99, Feb-15-04 12:01 PM, #10
RE: how bad are sony HU's?, Redmachine97, Apr-04-04 05:06 PM, #11

Top 2GNT Technical Interior/Exterior Audio, Alarms, AV topic #8115 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.021714925765991 seconds, executing 14 queries.