| Go back to previous topic | | Forum name | 4G63 Tech | | Topic subject | stock big rods + 12 second passes = somewhat reliable? | | Topic URL | https://forums.2gnt.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=i67&topic_id=8692 |
8692, stock big rods + 12 second passes = somewhat reliable? Posted by sd240, Apr-17-05 06:51 PM
Ok so I have a blown 6-bolt on my hands here, and I'm really wanting to get deep into the 12s. Oh yeah and funding is limited...go figure. Now I'm not trying to be a bench-racer here or anything, but in your opinions do you guys think that some forged pistons (probably wiseco or ross) and the 6-bolt big rods could get me well into the 12's and still be somewhat reliable? Thanks. Oh and on a side note my 6 bolt seems to have been expirencing a little crank walk, kinda suprised/scared me when I took it out.
|
8693, RE: stock big rods + 12 second passes = somewhat reliable? Posted by HybriDSM, Apr-18-05 04:02 AM
Stock 1g pistons and rods will get you well beyond 12's in an AWD DSM.
Don't worry about going forged for 12's. Save your cash and get stock pistons/rods and get to tuning. Tuning is what will get you there.
Also, crankwalk has happened to less than a handful of 6-bolts in their history. Are you sure it was CW?
|
8694, RE: stock big rods + 12 second passes = somewhat reliable? Posted by sd240, Apr-18-05 05:36 AM
ok well then what are the limits of the stock pistons and big rods? Oh and maybe it isn't crank walk, I'm not totally for sure what it is. All I know is that when i was trying to take the clutch off I pulled it and noticed that the whole crank would move more than I thought it should. I could just push it back and pull it out repeatedly. I looked at the dampner pulley to make sure it was moving and not just a problem with the clutch/flywheel or something, and the dampner was moving too.
|
8695, RE: stock big rods + 12 second passes = somewhat reliable? Posted by HybriDSM, Apr-18-05 07:02 AM
Stock pistons/rods are good to ~400+ hp with the tuning as the most important factor of their limit. Many people have gone into the 11's on stock pistons/rods. Shit even a heavily modded car with stock turbo has run mid 11's. Getting 2g pistons with 1g rods is a common application too. 2g pistons are higher compression and are used to make some more power with the 1g rods as a beefier partner. That's another option to consider.
Maybe it is crankwalk, but that would be a rarity. Get a feeler gauge and check the play in the crank when you press the clutch. It very well may be, but again, you would be among a select few. Doesn't mean it's impossible though.
|
8696, RE: stock big rods + 12 second passes = somewhat reliable? Posted by Jeff_99gs, Apr-18-05 07:28 AM
Fastest 7 bolt stock block (factory pistons and rods) is 11.2 at 129 or so. Stock 6 bolt blocks run into the 10's reliably. If your block was experiencing crankwalk, that means it is just normal bearing wear. Crankwalk is just premature bearing wear. Generally a 14 year old 6 bolt block will not have crankwalk but typical bearing wear.
|
8697, RE: stock big rods + 12 second passes = somewhat reliable? Posted by Pitchblack98, Apr-18-05 08:38 AM
My 6bolt block has 184k miles on it and when I tore it apart it had about 1/8" of back and forth play in the crank. I knew it was from normal wear on a car that had 20 psi ran on it daily. The crank bearings were pretty ugly when I took them out. I should see if I still have them and post up some pics for reference.
|
8698, RE: stock big rods + 12 second passes = somewhat reliable? Posted by sd240, Apr-18-05 03:24 PM
well this engine was rebuilt about 6k miles ago, so yea it was pretty premature wear. wish i hadn't been an idiot and drove the piss out of it when it was knocking, but I didn't think rich knock was such a big deal as lean knock. oh well live and learn, then kick yourself in the ass...really hard. The thing about the 2g pistons is that I live in a small hick town and there isn't a maching shop nearby to machine the rod end down, so I just thought I could save myself the hassle of finding one and order forged pistons. I'd LIKE to break into the elevens, but I don't know if I want to dish out the money to do that, especially with the high gas prices.
Anywho right now I have a 119k mile salvage yard replacement engine in my car that the rear main seal decided to crap out on as soon as i put it in the car, and I have it set at stock boost about 10~11 psi and I'm trying to get it tuned nicely, but I think I maxed out my injectors, what do you all think? here's the log
TIMA O2-R TPS RPM KNCK INJP --- 26° 0.02V 47.8% 1469 0 6.91ms 10 22° 0.84V 71.0% 1531 0 7.42ms 12 20° 0.84V 85.5% 1563 0 7.42ms 12 18° 0.82V 96.1% 1563 0 7.68ms 12 18° 0.86V 100.0% 1563 0 7.68ms 12 18° 0.86V 100.0% 1594 0 7.94ms 13 18° 0.86V 100.0% 1656 0 7.94ms 14 18° 0.86V 100.0% 1688 0 7.68ms 13 18° 0.84V 100.0% 1688 0 7.68ms 13 18° 0.82V 100.0% 1719 0 7.68ms 14 18° 0.80V 100.0% 1750 0 7.68ms 14 19° 0.70V 100.0% 1781 0 7.68ms 14 18° 0.57V 100.0% 1813 0 7.94ms 15 18° 0.59V 100.0% 1844 0 7.94ms 15 18° 0.68V 100.0% 1875 0 7.94ms 15 18° 0.66V 100.0% 1938 0 8.19ms 16 19° 0.64V 100.0% 1938 0 8.19ms 16 19° 0.43V 100.0% 1969 0 8.19ms 17 17° 0.43V 100.0% 2031 0 8.19ms 17 18° 0.41V 100.0% 2063 0 8.45ms 18 19° 0.57V 100.0% 2094 0 8.45ms 18 19° 0.68V 100.0% 2125 0 8.45ms 19 19° 0.51V 100.0% 2156 0 8.70ms 20 19° 0.74V 100.0% 2219 0 8.96ms 21 19° 0.74V 100.0% 2250 0 8.70ms 20 19° 0.68V 100.0% 2281 0 9.22ms 22 18° 0.78V 100.0% 2313 0 9.22ms 22 17° 0.76V 100.0% 2344 0 9.22ms 23 18° 0.82V 100.0% 2406 0 9.47ms 24 18° 0.74V 100.0% 2438 0 9.73ms 25 17° 0.78V 100.0% 2500 0 9.98ms 26 16° 0.82V 100.0% 2563 0 10.50ms 28 16° 0.80V 100.0% 2594 0 11.26ms 31 15° 0.84V 100.0% 2656 0 11.78ms 33 15° 0.84V 100.0% 2750 0 12.80ms 37 14° 0.86V 100.0% 2813 0 13.57ms 40 13° 0.86V 100.0% 2844 0 14.59ms 44 14° 0.86V 100.0% 2938 0 14.59ms 45 14° 0.88V 100.0% 2938 7 14.59ms 45 13° 0.88V 100.0% 3063 7 14.85ms 48 14° 0.88V 100.0% 3094 6 14.59ms 48 14° 0.88V 100.0% 3156 6 14.85ms 50 14° 0.88V 100.0% 3188 6 14.59ms 49 14° 0.88V 100.0% 3219 6 14.59ms 50 15° 0.88V 100.0% 3344 5 14.34ms 51 15° 0.86V 100.0% 3469 5 14.59ms 54 15° 0.86V 100.0% 3469 5 14.85ms 55 15° 0.88V 100.0% 3469 6 14.85ms 55 14° 0.86V 100.0% 3531 5 14.85ms 56 16° 0.86V 100.0% 3625 5 14.85ms 57 16° 0.86V 100.0% 3781 5 14.85ms 59 15° 0.88V 100.0% 3781 5 15.10ms 61 16° 0.88V 100.0% 3781 4 15.36ms 62 15° 0.88V 100.0% 3813 4 15.36ms 62 15° 0.86V 100.0% 3938 4 15.62ms 65 16° 0.86V 100.0% 4000 4 15.87ms 67 16° 0.86V 100.0% 4031 3 16.64ms 71 17° 0.86V 100.0% 4156 3 16.38ms 72 17° 0.88V 100.0% 4188 3 16.90ms 75 17° 0.86V 100.0% 4250 3 16.64ms 75 17° 0.86V 100.0% 4313 2 16.90ms 77 17° 0.86V 100.0% 4438 3 17.15ms 81 17° 0.86V 100.0% 4375 3 17.41ms 81 17° 0.86V 100.0% 4500 3 17.66ms 84 17° 0.86V 100.0% 4656 2 17.66ms 87 17° 0.86V 100.0% 4750 2 17.92ms 90 17° 0.86V 100.0% 4531 2 18.69ms 90 18° 0.86V 100.0% 4750 2 18.18ms 92 18° 0.86V 100.0% 4813 1 18.69ms 96 18° 0.86V 100.0% 5000 1 19.20ms 102 18° 0.86V 100.0% 5031 1 19.20ms 103 18° 0.86V 100.0% 4875 1 19.46ms 101 20° 0.86V 100.0% 4906 0 18.94ms 99 19° 0.86V 100.0% 5250 0 19.46ms 109 19° 0.86V 100.0% 5094 0 19.71ms 107 19° 0.86V 100.0% 5156 0 19.97ms 110 20° 0.86V 100.0% 5156 0 20.74ms 114 20° 0.86V 100.0% 5313 0 20.74ms 117 21° 0.86V 100.0% 5406 0 20.99ms 121 22° 0.86V 100.0% 5469 1 21.76ms 127 21° 0.84V 100.0% 5375 0 21.76ms 124 21° 0.84V 100.0% 5406 0 22.27ms 128 23° 0.84V 100.0% 5563 0 22.27ms 132 23° 0.84V 100.0% 5531 0 23.04ms 136 22° 0.84V 100.0% 5875 0 23.55ms 147 23° 0.84V 100.0% 5531 0 23.30ms 137 22° 0.84V 100.0% 5719 1 23.55ms 143 21° 0.84V 100.0% 5781 1 23.81ms 147 22° 0.84V 100.0% 5969 0 24.06ms 153 23° 0.84V 100.0% 5781 0 23.55ms 145 23° 0.84V 100.0% 5969 0 24.58ms 156 24° 0.84V 100.0% 5938 0 24.58ms 155 23° 0.84V 100.0% 6000 0 25.86ms 165 22° 0.84V 100.0% 6063 4 25.34ms 164 21° 0.84V 100.0% 6094 4 25.86ms 168 22° 0.84V 100.0% 6156 11 25.60ms 168 18° 0.84V 100.0% 6094 11 25.60ms 166 16° 0.82V 100.0% 6094 16 25.09ms 163 17° 0.82V 100.0% 6219 15 26.11ms 173 14° 0.82V 100.0% 6125 24 24.83ms 162 14° 0.82V 100.0% 6188 24 24.83ms 164 14° 0.82V 100.0% 6094 24 23.30ms 151 14° 0.82V 100.0% 6344 24 23.81ms 161 11° 0.82V 100.0% 6531 23 22.53ms 157 14° 0.82V 49.0% 6469 23 4.10ms 28 23° 0.80V 10.6% 6031 0 2.05ms 13
What do you all think? oh yeah i have a 255lb/hr fuel pump, apex DP and Cat-back, K&N with hacked can, and SAFC I and boost starts to creep quite a bit in the upper rpm's. Thanks a log guys
|
8699, RE: stock big rods + 12 second passes = somewhat reliable? Posted by sd240, Apr-18-05 03:43 PM
I almost forgot to give my SAFC settings...
RPM 3k..4k..5k...5.5k..6k...7k Cor +5 +9 +10 +20 +40 +45
Those are all on the high side
|
8700, new tuning question Posted by sd240, Apr-20-05 02:50 AM
anybody?
|
8701, RE: new tuning question Posted by HybriDSM, Apr-20-05 03:05 AM
Your knock counts and O2's say you are too lean. You have big end (High RPM) knock and your O2's are dipping into the low .80's. Richen up and it should improve. Also your timing is being pulled by 10* or so when this is happening. It should be in the low to mid 20*'s when tuned correctly.
What injectors again? Also, what are your compression numbers? Also, what about this boost creep problem you mentioned? Stock turbo with the 3" exhaust? Did you port the turbo to eliminate the creep? (Sorry if you've answered these before. I can't keep up with everyones setup.)
|
8702, RE: new tuning question Posted by sd240, Apr-20-05 01:31 PM
Stock 450 injectors, haven't checked compression(guess i should really do that), boost is creeping to about 15-16psi, stock 14b and 02 housing with 3in exhaust(slight porting on 02, but didn't help much) also I have some 650 injectors, but I'd kind of like to get everything lined out with the stock ones to make sure everything is going to work ok. Thanks
EDIT: I just remembered that I have the smaller honeycomb removed, not sure if that makes a big difference or not though
|
8703, RE: new tuning question Posted by HybriDSM, Apr-20-05 02:22 PM
Originally posted by sd240 Stock 450 injectors, haven't checked compression(guess i should really do that), boost is creeping to about 15-16psi, stock 14b and 02 housing with 3in exhaust(slight porting on 02, but didn't help much) also I have some 650 injectors, but I'd kind of like to get everything lined out with the stock ones to make sure everything is going to work ok. Thanks EDIT: I just remembered that I have the smaller honeycomb removed, not sure if that makes a big difference or not though
You need to port the shit out of the 02 housing and flapper hole to get it to work without boostcreep.
|
8704, RE: new tuning question Posted by Hult250R, Apr-20-05 02:54 PM
Originally posted by HybriDSMOriginally posted by sd240 Stock 450 injectors, haven't checked compression(guess i should really do that), boost is creeping to about 15-16psi, stock 14b and 02 housing with 3in exhaust(slight porting on 02, but didn't help much) also I have some 650 injectors, but I'd kind of like to get everything lined out with the stock ones to make sure everything is going to work ok. Thanks EDIT: I just remembered that I have the smaller honeycomb removed, not sure if that makes a big difference or not though You need to port the shit out of the 02 housing and flapper hole to get it to work without boostcreep.
I had to add a machine a bigger flapper and add a tubular o2 dump housing to get rid of my creep on my 16G. Now it stays rock solid at whatever I set it at.
|
8705, RE: new tuning question Posted by SaberKhan, Apr-21-05 03:51 PM
You dont have to get the rods machined anymore. Nippon racing is making 2G style pistons that fit stock 1G rods. They are also a bit better quality than the stock 2G's. Also, any type of detonation/preignition is bad, period. It murders ring lands, hammers rod bearings and generally reaks havoc on engines. They showed us at school high speed videos taken inside a specially prepped head of the normal combustion process, then one detonating. Very violent explosion causing pressure peaks up to 20X that of normal combustion. Preignition is probably the worst because it detonates before the piston has reached top dead center, and this is bad news for the big ends of the rod and the rod journals on the crank.
| |