| Go back to previous topic |
| Forum name | The Pits v3.1 |
| Topic subject | 09 Eclipse |
| Topic URL | https://forums.2gnt.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=i60&topic_id=31307 |
31307, 09 Eclipse Posted by 992gnt, Feb-04-08 12:15 PM
If it's a repost, bite me.
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-mitsubishi-eclipse/622772/
|
31308, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by goalie40, Feb-04-08 12:32 PM
better, less plastic up front. Ill wait for the Mitsubishi RA.
|
31310, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by noboost, Feb-04-08 12:57 PM
210+ hp? under 3000lb? AWD? Turbo? <$17-25k?
SOLD! I'm buying two.
|
31313, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by Malenko, Feb-04-08 01:26 PM
I hate all these proprietary radios in the dash, no way to replace them.
|
31320, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by CopperEclipse96, Feb-04-08 03:09 PM
If it was available with the EVO engine and drivetrain... even a detuned version... I would be highly interested. And if it didn't weigh so much.
|
31323, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by eclipzGST, Feb-04-08 03:48 PM
WHOA! Aside of the mirror right in the MIDDLE of the door,that looks fucking NICE!!!
|
31334, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by vegasdsmr, Feb-04-08 07:12 PM
it has an srt4 wang on it....
|
31361, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by BigRedMonster, Feb-05-08 06:49 AM
ehhhh, shed some pounds and relocate the side mirrors and remove all the chrome accents and it might look ok.
|
31362, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by DR1665, Feb-05-08 06:53 AM
I dunno. I think I'd wait for the RA too. All I can think of when I look at this picture is...
ZOMGZ!

Looks like Pikachu is about to shit himself or something. :eek
The article says it best...
But it's tough to overlook the fundamental flaws of the Eclipse, which include being a heavy front-wheel-drive coupe that shares a lineage with a certain much-missed all-wheel-drive, turbo-four pocket rocket.
|
31363, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by slowmitsu, Feb-05-08 06:58 AM
Originally posted by DR1665 Looks like Pikachu is about to shit himself or something.
ZOMGZ! MORE FIBER!
|
31377, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by FlyinEsi, Feb-05-08 11:35 AM
I don't like it. Looks like an SRT-4 cross-breaded with a cavalier.
|
31393, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by 95greenhrcgs, Feb-05-08 04:07 PM
I can appreciate what they want to do looks wise, but how many people are gonna say "hey they copied the GT-R front end"????? Looks better, but there are things about that model that I still have issues with. The 2G was and is the best looking model of the Eclipse/Talon that came out.
|
31400, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by DSMRoadster, Feb-05-08 07:50 PM
Originally posted by DR1665I dunno. I think I'd wait for the RA too. All I can think of when I look at this picture is... ZOMGZ!  Looks like Pikachu is about to shit himself or something. :eek The article says it best... But it's tough to overlook the fundamental flaws of the Eclipse, which include being a heavy front-wheel-drive coupe that shares a lineage with a certain much-missed all-wheel-drive, turbo-four pocket rocket.
is it just me, or does this car looks like it's high on caffeine? Head lights looks like it's bugging out.
|
31402, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by dsmtuner1, Feb-06-08 03:13 AM
Personally some black housings on the headlights and taillights and a mirror relocation would make that one sexxxxxyyyyyy car. Very minor cosmetic flaws. Now as for the engine and drivetrain i wont even get started. They just keep missing the fundamentals!!!!!
|
31403, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by wickedtalon, Feb-06-08 04:38 AM
I'll pass. I think it looks ugly.
|
31410, RE: 09 Eclipse Posted by Keith2172, Feb-06-08 08:57 AM
I like it well enough, even the mirrors I can take. The one thing that I cant stand and is reason enough for me not to buy it are the "wing" windows in the front, I need to have a car where the whole window rolls down.
|