Go back to previous topic
Forum nameHandling/Suspension
Topic subjectRE: DropZone breaking into the East Coast Market?
Topic URLhttp://forums.2gnt.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=27571&mesg_id=27626
27626, RE: DropZone breaking into the East Coast Market?
Posted by dsmmyth, Dec-31-69 06:00 PM
Originally posted by L2RTSiAWD
Originally posted by dsmmyth EclipseTenzoR and I have talked extensively about our cars and buying parts for it, and we had one thing in common. When we had the car in its earlier stages, we would put absolute JUNK on it, but now (him and I), are attempting to get our car going in the right way. When the word of suspension came up, he said that he had heard that DZ was good with springs, but not with coilovers. He searched and even asked some people how they liked their ride and the majority of it was positive. So he went with dropzones, which is satisfactory for what his setup and budget was. From what I have seen and heard about on tuners DZ is 50/50 with feedback from customers on their products. But in "my" opinion, for my car, I would never go lower than 1.5", which puts me in the market for Tein S-techs or such. The only thing that's keeping me from Dropzone is it will drop it too low, and it will kind of being in that same pool of Honda Civic owners with horrible camber and worn tires.
The point I'm trying to make is 50/50 is not a very good track record. How many people do you see complaining about Eibachs,Teins, Ground Controls,not many. On the flipside how many people complain about DZ's, Tenzo's, Goldlines, Sprints or any other cheap ebay brand. I'm not bashing on any of you I'm just trying to get the information out there. P.S. Excessive toe causes the tire wear not camber.


You're absoultely right, 50/50 is not a good record. And thanks for the clearing up of toe and camber. I couldn't remember which one it was. But then again, I'm not a suspension guru.

And Dropzone has been around awhile and it still seems to be as popular as it was 2 years ago.
I generated this page in 0.0088720321655273 seconds, executing 6 queries.