| Go back to previous topic | | Forum name | Handling/Suspension | | Topic subject | 1st Gen GST same rear suspension? | | Topic URL | https://forums.2gnt.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=i6&topic_id=10798 |
10798, 1st Gen GST same rear suspension? Posted by Rainmaker, Jul-13-02 07:47 PM
Does the 1st gen GST have the same rear suspension at the 2g RS, GS, and GST?
*Edit* It looks the same...but the spring perches look a lot bigger.
|
10799, RE: 1st Gen GST same rear suspension? Posted by Karl, Jul-14-02 08:31 AM
No, they are not the same. You cannot use 1G springs or struts on the 2G or vice versa.
|
10800, RE: 1st Gen GST same rear suspension? Posted by Rainmaker, Jul-14-02 09:59 AM
Ugghhh....ok. Thank you!
|
10801, HELL NO! Posted by VX100, Jul-15-02 02:04 AM
Nope they are totally different, nor would you want to use anything at all from a 1st generation FWD DSM's rear suspension. It is a VERY old design. A monkey could have designed the rear FWD 1st gen suspension!
The FWD 1st gens use a solid axle suspension setup with a panhard arm to locate the axle (along with two control arms or trailing arms, whatever you want to call them). Our rear multi-link setup is literally DECADES more advanced than a panhard arm setup. Our whole suspension setup is far more advanced than a FWD 1st gen. Multilink setup at all wheels vs. front macpherson struts with a solid rear axle, no contest 2nd gens are FAR better.
If you just care about keeping the rear wheels somewhat in line while going from point A to B and you need a simple easy to design and dirt cheap suspension setup, you use a panhard arm solid axle setup (just look under any chrysler K car and lots of other early 90s and earlier american made FWD junk, you'll see the exact same setup).
| |