#78086, "RE: What do you think about this turbo" In response to Reply # 0
T3/T4's are not that expensive anyway.
a .82 AR hotside is a bit big for a 2.0L. it'll spool slow.
with the 4 bolt discharge flange, you'll have to re-make your downpipe.
it it wer eme, i'd go for a GT series, with a T3 hotsaide just for manifold and downpipe compatibility.
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
#78088, "RE: What do you think about this turbo" In response to Reply # 1
We are making a new manifold/ down pipe that’s why i was just looking at this turbo. Your right though, im going to stick with a t3 hot side...would you say .60 hot side is a reasonable compromise ?
--------------------------------------- "Oh yea, well...My manifold does cool twisty things"
#78090, "RE: What do you think about this turbo" In response to Reply # 2
.60 is good on a 2.0L.. i use a .63 AR hotside myself.
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
