Welcome to the 2GNT Forum! Interested In Advertising with 2GNT?
Home | Site Background| Info&Specs| Mods & Tech Info | CAPS | Part Reviews | Donate | 2GNT Stickers |
Search Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend 1 User in Chat
Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #109699
View in linear mode

Subject: "RE: Missing link vs fcd: Which would you recommend?" Previous topic | Next topic
SilvrEclipsAug-05-13 04:40 PM
Member since Nov 27th 2007
534 posts,
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#109704, "RE: Missing link vs fcd: Which would you recommend?"
In response to In response to 4


          

I never had a single issue with with my Missing Link, I would go with that, super simple install and no wiring to mess with.

98 Eclipse GS Turbo
Built motor - MS2 - Holset hy35 - Zoom Stg 4 Clutch - 57.5mm TB - ARP Headstuds - Turbonetics wastegate - 3" Turbo back - FMIC - Greddy RZ BOV - Walbro 255 - 650cc Injectors - Fidanza Flywheel - Cobra calipers w/ 13" Rotors - Oil Cooler - DevilsOwn meth injection

1981 Chevy Scottsdale
1987 Nissan 300zx - Chump Car
2001 BMW 325i

  

Report This Post to Admin Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

Missing link vs fcd: Which would you recommend? [View all] , TurbchargdSpydr, Aug-01-13 06:01 AM
  RE: Missing link vs fcd: Which would you recommend?, TurbchargdSpydr, Aug-01-13 08:45 PM, #1
RE: Missing link vs fcd: Which would you recommend?, Grothe3297avenger, Aug-01-13 11:59 PM, #2
      RE: Missing link vs fcd: Which would you recommend?, TurbchargdSpydr, Aug-02-13 01:34 AM, #3
           RE: Missing link vs fcd: Which would you recommend?, Grothe3297avenger, Aug-02-13 10:16 AM, #4
                RE: Missing link vs fcd: Which would you recommend?, SilvrEclips, Aug-05-13 04:40 PM #5

Top 2GNT Technical Turbo/Nitrous Tech topic #109699 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.2
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com

I generated this page in 0.041975021362305 seconds, executing 12 queries.