#457, "RE: Can we dump the limit on time to edit posts?" In response to In response to 10
Originally posted by DR1665
Originally posted by Corbin And if someone posts some really retarded response, I like to see them hang for it without the ability to edit their post after people start ripping on them.
I know I'm hanging all over this place like that, but I also agree entirely. Thank God for the edit feature for at least a few minutes! LOL
60, actually. I'm more worried about the revisionist history aspect of removing the edit time limit - if we remove it, people can edit their posts as far back as 2001. I think that is a bad thing and the potential for misuse vastly outweighs the benefit provided for one single section. It's all or nothing - some amount of time for every post everywhere or none at all. I know the code, and it's just not reasonably possible to make that per-forum dependant.
And, since i get the last say in the end regardless, no. Sorry.
______________________________ If a sentence found online has 35% misspellings or greater and includes at least two racially charged expletives, chances are it is a YouTube comment.
'95 Eclipse TurboGS (garage deco) '95 TSi AWD (restoring a survivor) '97 Talon ESi-T (poor impulse control) '99 Eclipse RS-T (daily beater) '13 Evo X (mostly stock) '17 Sienna (Middle Aged Dad Mobile)
Thank God for the edit feature for at least a few minutes! LOL
